New site layout/site
Posted on 2004-12-12 by ivo :: /site :: link
I have changed the site design again, the old one got boring.
The new layout is vaguely based on an article from A List Apart, called Creating
Liquid Layouts with Negative Margins.
The layout works like I intended in mozilla, opera and konqueror,
and looks not-entirely-horrible in internet explorer. The latter
looks fixable, and I'll try to do that some time soon. I will
probably be tweaking the layout for some time to come.
Everything in the right-hand column is static, by the way. I had
been struggling with some blosxom plugins to generate a photo
album, but none of them did what I wanted them to do. So another
item for the wishlist of wirescape plugins is a photo-album
plugin.
lychnis.net live/site
Posted on 2004-01-12 by ivo :: /site :: link
My new domain lychnis.net is alive, and I created a
brand new website for it. Take a look at the information about the
site to find out what it means, or just go there.
The new site is also based on blosxom, with a few minor
modifications to some of the plugins (most notably the hide
plugin). The articles are the same as in the weblog. Only the
most recent article is shown on the frontpage, the rest can still
be read by clicking on weblog in the navigation bar at
the top.
Font sizes/site
Posted on 2004-01-03 by ivo :: /site :: link
Someone has been complaining that the fonts on this website are
too big. This comment touches a subject that I've often enraged
myself about: default font sizes in browsers.
For some reason or other, Microsoft ships Internet Explorer with
a rather large default font size setting. People aren't exactly
inclined to change anything, so most of the IE users will be using
this default. This has inspired web designers all over the world
to specify smaller fonts on their websites, to make it look
acceptable in IE.
Mozilla ships with a default font size of 16 points, I always
change that to 12 points to be able to read pages that don't
specify anything in a comfortable font size. This does mean that
I see websites that were designed for IE (which is a bad thing to
do at any time) with very small, nearly illegible text.
I designed the layout of this website for my own browser, and it
looks good (well, acceptable) in Internet Explorer, when you
change the font to “Smallest”. I will not
change the size of the fonts here, people should configure their
browsers to display fonts in the size they like. If you keep the
default of IE or Mozilla, you get what you asked for: large
letters.
Hacker logo/site
Posted on 2003-11-04 by ivo :: /site :: link
You may have noticed I added the "Hacker logo"
to the bottom right of this page somewhere last week. Of course
I first read about it when it appeared
on slashdot. The reactions
there were mostly negative, with arguments such as:
- Hackers don't need a logo;
- It will be abused by crackers and other dubious figures;
- The media will use it for anything related with computers, and
bedazzle its meaning;
- Why does Eric Raymond want his statue carved in the face of the
moon;
- Why did he have to chose a glider that moves down?
Personally, I like the idea of having a logo. Like it says in the
FAQ, having
the logo on your website doesn't make you a hacker; that is a
title you have to earn. Instead I want to show my sympathies
to the hacker culture, show anyone that I share visions.
I agree somewhat with the sentiments that "a
gun crazed wack job that would scare most moms out of the day
care center". Like Richard Stallman once said at
an edition of FOSDEM,
It doesn't help your case for free software if you mingle
your views with political statements. People will close their
minds for your arguments for free software if you also make
statements that they disagree with, even if they are in a
different field.
But even so, Eric has done a lot of good work for the open
source/free software world in general. I have never met him in
person, I wouldn't know if he deserves any of the criticism he
gets. In any case, it would be unfair to refuse to use the hacker
logo solely because you disagree with Eric.
The idea to take a glider for the logo is brilliant, of course.
It's simple, and could be represented in ASCII very well. I don't
care much that Eric chose the one that goes down, any variant
would do. Plus I think this one looks good :) I've just become
interested in finite state machines and cellular automata.
I don't fear much for usage of the logo by people who aren't
hackers in the original
meaning; "we'll find some way to shame and reject you
publicly if you mess with ours."
And the media, well… that's just a matter of consequently
using the image as a link to Eric's explanation page.
People will pick up its real meaning, and if they don't they
should be politely corrected. I hope the real hackers among us
are civilized enough to keep their anger down if anyone uses it in
the wrong way.